> Sources speaking to The Verge are convinced [...]
Paranoid schizophrenics are also often convinced they're Napoleon, just saying.
There must be some solid journalism behind the article to confirm those sources, I imagine.
Is there any conflict of interest here? Like Comcast (telecom conglomerate) owning The Verge?
Let me reverse engineer this article: "Musk is probably a crook, and taking over the Library of Congress is a scumbag move, let's put the two things closer to make it look like their new telecom is evil".
Funny thing is that Musk is probably a crook indeed, and taking over the Library of Congress sounds like a terrible evil move. However, exaggerating it to play telecom wars doesn't help at all.
I guess we're in an age that we can't trust media owned by tech or telecoms.
Bring good journalism back. It sucks to not have it, for everyone.
One of many constitutional crises. You just love to hear that.
> Sources speaking to The Verge are convinced [...]
Paranoid schizophrenics are also often convinced they're Napoleon, just saying.
There must be some solid journalism behind the article to confirm those sources, I imagine.
Is there any conflict of interest here? Like Comcast (telecom conglomerate) owning The Verge?
Let me reverse engineer this article: "Musk is probably a crook, and taking over the Library of Congress is a scumbag move, let's put the two things closer to make it look like their new telecom is evil".
Funny thing is that Musk is probably a crook indeed, and taking over the Library of Congress sounds like a terrible evil move. However, exaggerating it to play telecom wars doesn't help at all.
I guess we're in an age that we can't trust media owned by tech or telecoms.
Bring good journalism back. It sucks to not have it, for everyone.