Milpotel 2 hours ago Don't get too exited - Technitium has a bus factor of one, a very small user base and no previous auditing. esseph an hour ago And yet here I am deploying it in production
avhception 3 hours ago When I read "PDNS", I will probably always think "PowerDNS". feldrim an hour ago Yes. That's why I put the footnote there. avhception 26 minutes ago Well, I read that footnote, but I'm not sure if overloading the acronym is the best idea, is what I'm trying to say.
feldrim an hour ago Yes. That's why I put the footnote there. avhception 26 minutes ago Well, I read that footnote, but I'm not sure if overloading the acronym is the best idea, is what I'm trying to say.
avhception 26 minutes ago Well, I read that footnote, but I'm not sure if overloading the acronym is the best idea, is what I'm trying to say.
feldrim 3 hours ago I've played with threat intelligence to build a simple, on premises PDNS out of a privacy-focused DNS server.
Don't get too exited - Technitium has a bus factor of one, a very small user base and no previous auditing.
And yet here I am deploying it in production
When I read "PDNS", I will probably always think "PowerDNS".
Yes. That's why I put the footnote there.
Well, I read that footnote, but I'm not sure if overloading the acronym is the best idea, is what I'm trying to say.
I've played with threat intelligence to build a simple, on premises PDNS out of a privacy-focused DNS server.